Search for: "State v. First Judicial Dist." Results 81 - 100 of 1,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The State may not be held liable for the actions of a state-employed judge that are cloaked with judicial immunity (Montesano v State of New York, 11 AD3d 436 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The State may not be held liable for the actions of a state-employed judge that are cloaked with judicial immunity (Montesano v State of New York, 11 AD3d 436 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:24 pm by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
  On April 6, 2020, the Judicial Council issued Emergency rule 9, which tolled all civil statutes of limitation until 90 days after the state of emergency was lifted. [read post]
15 May 2022, 7:38 am by Russell Knight
, that an issue not presented to the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, is not rigid and inflexible. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
” Recognizing that the Sherman Act could be read to bar all contracts, federal courts for over a century have interpreted the 1890 antitrust law only to apply to “unreasonable” restraints of trade.[7] The Supreme Court first adopted this concept in its landmark 1911 decision in Standard Oil, upholding the lower court’s dissolution of John D. [read post]