Search for: "State v. Furlough" Results 81 - 100 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2013, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
At Bloomberg View, Cass Sunstein discusses Schuette v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 9:26 pm by Dan Flynn
But with little niceties in the Constitution about rights to a speedy trial and all those discovery deadlines, it is going to be interesting to see just how the United States v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm by Jimmy Verner
 State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Summer 2009 by Jimmy L. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 11:08 am by Steve Kalar
Judge Margaret McKeownThe Ninth has endorsed a radical proposition:    CJA counsel can ask to get paid for their work.United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:17 am by Brad Schnure
When their proposal was challenged, the New Jersey Supreme Court reaffirmed in Lance v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:09 am by Ray Mullman
It notes that states have resorted to periodically closing their courts, eliminating programs, imposing unpaid furloughs, reducing court hours and staffs – dubbing these collective cutbacks an improper “rationing of justice. [read post]