Search for: "State v. GC" Results 81 - 100 of 461
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
(See Part I here, Part II here, Part III here, Part IV here, and Part V here.)The reason for its inability is that both the Constitution (Art. [read post]
Also issued on June 1, was General Counsel’s memo GC 20-07 providing guidance on implementation of the new rules not enjoined by Judge Jackson. [read post]
8 May 2020, 8:16 am by Joy Waltemath
A federal district court, citing those allegations, has denied the employer’s motion to dismiss the hostile work environment claim, as well as claims for discrimination and retaliation under Title VII, the ADEA, and Pennsylvania state law (Murphy v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Nuno Calaim Lourenço describes Printeos v Commission: Importance Of Equal Treatment And Duty To State Reasons In The Calculation Of Fines On Mono-Product Undertakings. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am by Léon Dijkman
It can be inferred from the decision that the CJEU agrees, stating as it does that application will require an "exceptional case" [par. 75]. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am by Riana Harvey
The GC also stated that Tulliallan could rely on the protection of earlier mark’s reputation for all of the services covered by earlier marks in Class 35. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  The data protection principles were also central to the way in which the much more recent case of GC et. al. v CNIL assessed the processing of past criminal proceedings. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:37 am by Verena von Bomhard
The GC further stated that trademarks in the field of pet care products and food (classes 5 and 31) would normally be perceived visually, as the products are purchased from shelves. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 10:26 am
However, it also emphasised that, even though the legalisation of cannabis for therapeutic and recreational purposes is under discussion across the EU, the consumption and use of cannabis containing THC above a stated threshold remains illegal in most EU Member States. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:06 pm
However, the recent Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Bobek in case C-702/18, Primart Marek Łukasiewicz v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
Kluwer Trademark Blog discussed Alliance Pharmaceuticals Limited v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:44 am by Simon Lester
The final part of the book (Chapter V) goes beyond narrow legal arguments and asks about possible motives of the US for the blockage. [read post]