Search for: "State v. Going Places Travel Corporation" Results 81 - 100 of 248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am by Kara OBrien
All seems to be going according to plan until word gets back to the Employee that some of the local residents are protesting the new water plant. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:27 am by Amy Howe
Alluding to the court’s campaign-finance jurisprudence, she asked pointedly, “If you are going to treat a corporation like a person, which we seem to be doing,” why wouldn’t a corporation be subject to suit in the states where it is registered? [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For the Grutter Court, it was important that law schools are places that train political leaders—congresspersons, Senators, federal judges, and military top brass—in addition to corporate executives. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Sponsored Topics: United States Attorney - Law - Los Angeles - United States - US Attorney [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
And that value was as important for the Chinese, Russians, and second tier group of American-wary states, as it now appears to be to the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am by Dan Lopez
I’ll avoid starting with the history of antitrust law in general because I think the right place to start here is we have a law in the United States, the Clayton Act, that specifically regulates mergers. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
From how we get our food on our plates, to how we travel, to the way we interact daily, using digital apps and platforms, antitrust touches each and every one of us in ways we may not even realize. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am by rainey Reitman
  Resources Data Harvesting and Profiling: Ricci v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
(Another interesting two-colour combination case is Giro Travel Company [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
Now to jump forward almost a decade to Vavilov and yet another go at providing useful guidance on judicial review. [read post]