Search for: "State v. Hungary"
Results 81 - 100
of 459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2018, 12:59 am
Interestingly, with regard to this last issue, the Constitutional Court refers to the CJEU decision C-146/13 Spain v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm
Hungary and Otegi Mondragon v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
“ According to the Court‘s recent judgment in Holocaust litigation against Hungary (Simon v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:37 am
Constitution and in similar clauses in state constitutions. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
Although some scholars may disagree, Hague V and Hague XIII generally reflect CIL binding on all states. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:57 am
Hungary (application no. 18030/11). [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
A summary of the oral arguments in Republic of Hungary v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 3:52 pm
In the judge's words, "Under these circumstances, the time has come for this court to rule without hearing from the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm
Hungary (no. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:31 am
It is entirely clear that the reasons for invocating Article V and its requirements on member states to act is not clear. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 8:16 am
A letter box in Hungary. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 1:49 pm
The court also issued a one-sentence opinion vacating a lower-court ruling in Republic of Hungary v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:24 am
Kai-chieh Chan, Álvarez y Marín Corporación and Others v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm
That order seems reasonable and fairly easily followed.So a couple of weeks later plaintiffs respond to the OSC and identify where the defendants are indeed located -- Louisiana and Hungary -- and further states that diversity thus exists because "while plaintiffs come from several states and Australia, none are residents or citizens of Louisiana. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 2:30 am
Luckily, the European Court of Justice answered this question over a month ago.The case of Iron & Smith v Unilever dealt with a national application for the mark "be Impulsive" in Hungary, lodged by Iron & Smith. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:57 pm
Pharma Expressz appealed the decision, refusing marketing authorisation, to the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest High Court, Hungary). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:25 am
Hammer v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Hungary, Intermediary liability https://t.co/T2vEgFvkmx -> Wait… Did you say jail time for trademark infringement? [read post]
