Search for: "State v. J. D. C."
Results 81 - 100
of 3,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
C. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the… [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am
Crude oil contains metals such as Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Nickel (Ni), and Vanadium (V). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
There is no conflict between the relief requested by Donald J. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
Fifth, there is a state action overlay when it comes to Big Tech censorship (see Missouri v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Choper Distinguished Professor of Law Berkeley Law Gabriel J. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
Hays, and C. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:47 pm
In the third case, United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
EU On 21 December 2023, the CJEU issued judgement in the case of Krankenversicherung Nordrhein (C-667/21). [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Lawlor, 2022 ONCA 645; 2023 SCC 34 (40500) O’Bonsawin J. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
Westbrook, decided today by the Utah Court of Appeals (written by Judge Ryan D. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
C. [read post]
