Search for: "State v. Jennings" Results 81 - 100 of 782
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2019, 10:10 am by Jack Pringle
"South Carolina Supreme Court: Web-Based Emails Are Not "Backup"In 2012, the South Carolina Supreme Court, in Jennings v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
Diane Jennings writes, "He had no right to order state review, justices say," in the Dallas Morning News.Texas solicitor general Ted Cruz, who argued the case before the Supreme Court, said in a written statement that the high court's ruling, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, "protects our independent judiciary from interference by foreign courts. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
Copenhagen DK, Corvallis and Santa Monica USA – 22 May 2009 by Gregg Walker, Tina Monberg, and Kenneth Cloke of Mediators Beyond Borders, 
Jens Emborg, Mie Marcussen, Lone Clausen, and Vibeke Vindeløv of Nordic Mediators Place: Glyptoteket, Copenhagen Date: The 10th and 11th December 2009 During eleven days in December 2009 delegates from throughout the world will meet in Copenhagen for the 15th Conference of the… [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am by Anna Salvatore
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of The Lawfare Podcast called “The State of the US-China Relationship” featuring Scott R. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:31 am by Andrew Hamm
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses Jennings v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
This article analyses how a young man who might have been marginalized in society because of the circumstances of his birth, ethnic origin, and religious identity rose to prominence in law, politics, and business in the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 6:11 am by Vishnu Kannan
Hadley Baker shared appellate briefs from both parties in Trump v. [read post]