Search for: "State v. Judith Law" Results 81 - 100 of 542
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2020, 7:28 am by INFORRM
As HMCTS official guidance states [PDF], “The media are entitled by law to hear and be present at all open court proceedings (including those with reporting restrictions in place). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am by Dave
In short, the Court found that the reviewer failed to engage with the substance of an expert report provided on Mr Guiste by a distinguished consultant psychiatrist, Dr Judith Freedman, as to his mental state if he became homeless. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am by Steve Vladeck
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
Regulation BI was adopted in June 2019, became effective September 10, 2019, and firms will be required to begin complying with the rule by June 30, 2020 (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by SHG
The privilege predated this nation, and was explained 180 years ago by the United States Supreme Court in Stein v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late… [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
Dean, instructed by Barclay Churchill Lawyers This report was originally published in the Gazette of Law and Journalism, Australia’s leading online media law publication. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 1:52 pm by Mike Mireles
  One interesting issue is whether it will preempt all state law privacy laws. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Gene Editing Judith Daar, University of California Irvine School of Law, Human Germline Genome Editing: Dilemmas in Informed Consent Eileen Kane, Penn State Law, A Volatile Year in Human Genome Editing Myrisha Lewis, Howard University School of Law, The Coming Age of Gene Editing: Medical Promise, Regulation, and the Revival of Decades of Debate Maxwell Mehlman, Case Western Reserve University, Regulating Do-It-Yourself Gene Editing C. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm by Bill Marler
He stated he took a full-strength aspirin tablet (325 mg) every day but was not on any other blood thinners. [read post]