Search for: "State v. K. L. G."
Results 81 - 100
of 612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am
Forty-two states levy individual income taxes. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:14 am
Int’l Shoe, 92 USPQ at 332; Baker v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:23 am
Riggs and Amanda K. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 10:57 am
Law Lessons from ADRIANNE a/k/a "ANDEE C. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Hagerman, Jr. and Michele G. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 7:57 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am
Table of Contents Key Findings State Individual Income Tax Structures Map: How High are Individual Income Tax Rates in Your State? [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
See also John G. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:14 am
Next up: V is for Veterans’ Benefits Under the Tax Code, income is reportable and taxable unless otherwise excluded. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
V. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
Raymond's employersExhibit K-Defendant's objection to Gustave Lindor motion as "fishing expedition"Exhibit L-Ray Beckerman to Hon. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:03 am
Shultz Former Secretary of State General Michael V. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:49 am
L) Who was a recent presidential candidate? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Zehra G. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
Arizona (f, g, w) 2.50% > $0 2.50% > $0 $13,850 $27,700 n.a. n.a. $100 credit Arkansas 2.00% > $0 2.00% > $0 $2,270 $4,540 $29 credit $58 credit $29 credit (d, h, i, o, oo) 4.00% > $4,300 4.00% > $4,300 4.90% > $8,500 4.90% > $8,500 California 1.00% > $0 1.00% > $0 $5,202 $10,404 $140 credit $280 credit $433 credit (a, i, k, l, m, n, o, rr) 2.00% > $10,099 2.00%… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
As the present disclaimers have the purpose of restoring novelty over D4b, it is necessary in view of the criteria developed in decision G 1/03 for allowability of disclaimers introduced to restore novelty to determine whether D4b published between the priority date claimed and the filing date represents state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or a disclosure pursuant to A 54(2). [6] In the context of assessing whether D4b is state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or A 54(2),… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Stuart K. [read post]
