Search for: "State v. Khan"
Results 81 - 100
of 623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v DD (Afghanistan) [2010] EWCA Civ 1407 (10 December 2010) Dewan & Ors v Lewis [2010] EWCA Civ 1382 (09 December 2010) Shah v Shah [2010] EWCA Civ 1408 (09 December 2010) Compania Sud Americana De Vapores SA v Sinochem Tianjin Ltd (Aconcagua) [2010] EWCA Civ 1403 (09 December 2010) Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Yahoo! [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:18 pm
” Rahnema v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:26 pm
Last month, the California Court of Appeal determined in Khan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 5:06 am
This lawsuit was filed in State District Court and the defendants removed it to Federal Court based on their assertion that Texas General and Khan were improperly joined in an effort to defeat diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:26 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
Khan, 522 U. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:29 am
On February 28, 2008, Gomez presented defendant with a Zyprexa prescription (an antipsychotic drug), stating that it was for his girlfriend/wife. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:04 pm
One answer may be found in a decision by EDNY Judge Gleeson, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:02 am
Dorf, Eugene Volokh, panelists. 35 Georgia State University Law Review 937-975 (2019). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 7:48 am
Khan’s “disregard for the rule of law and due process. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Timothy Edgar discussed how judges should follow the technical approach laid out in Van Buren v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
However, this is not sufficient to prevent future investor-state arbitration challenges – as it will not affect the huge amount of BITs already in force between UPCA Members and third states. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 7:21 pm
Apr. 25, 2022) 2022 WL 1210945 (unpublished); Khan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
” He had come to the United States in 1974 on a student visa, had graduated from the New York Institute of Technology, held a permanent resident visa, and traveled frequently between Pakistan and the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 12:27 pm
In today’s case (Cheema v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:46 pm
Khan is Legal Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
