Search for: "State v. L. A. T." Results 81 - 100 of 9,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2014, 8:30 am by Paul Caron
State Dep't of Taxation & Fin., 44 Cumb. [read post]
18 May 2007, 11:27 am
Because theHolocaust Victims Redress Act, according to Judge Thomas, doesn't create a private right of action (which seems pretty right) and the plaintiffs' state law claims are time-barred (ditto).Art law. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:27 pm
Or, en l’espèce, le Lanham Act ne fixe aucun délai (légal) au dépôt de l’action en annulation de l’enregistrement d’une marque. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
The morning the ECJ delivered its judgment in L'Oreal v Bellure, on whether 'knock off' imitation perfumes which clearly weren't the trade marked goods, but were marketed in a way that 'winked at' L'Oreal's famous perfume brands, infringed L'Oreal's trade marks and were protected as permissible comparative advertising.Is harm needed for unfair advantage? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
The post Texas Abortion Laws Don't Regulate Out-of-State Abortions appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]