Search for: "State v. Lavin" Results 81 - 100 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2012, 8:16 am
 A request to “reconsider” a final and binding administrative determination does not toll the running of the Statute of Limitations [Lavin v Lawrence, 54 AD3d 412]. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, while providing financial advice may be within the scope or an accountant's duties, and so within the definition of a conventional business relationship, the  standard that plaintiffs must meet to sustain a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty has not been met (Staffenberg v Fairfield Pagma Assoc., L.P., 2012 NY AppDiv LEXIS 3423, citing Friedman v Anderson, supra at 166; ef Lavin v Kaufman, Greenhut, Lebowitz & Forman, 226 AD2d… [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Gravante, the attorney who represented Frank Esposito in People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
 I thought that was the province of places like . . . well, I won't mention any particular state. [read post]