Search for: "State v. Leathers"
Results 81 - 100
of 329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 3:17 pm
This was one of the most fought over issues in the Louboutin v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
State, 600 So.2d 967 (Miss. 1992); Martin v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:55 pm
Although this action was brought after the Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:13 am
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
Stephens v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
Holder), and overruled earlier decisions involving antitrust (Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:10 am
See slip opinion in Caperton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:53 pm
The Northern District of Illinois recently debated this in Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:14 pm
" At the Antitrust Review, Manfred Gabriel has this post on the forthcoming decision in Twombly and David Fischer has this analysis of the oral argument in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 11:13 am
See State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 11:13 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 8:39 am
See, e.g., Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
rejected Plaintiffs' argument that an antitrust stalwart, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
The goods in Class 18 included ‘articles of leather and imitations of leather; bags; handbags; shoulder bags; bumbags; sports bags; casual bags; briefcases; attaché cases; satchels; beauty cases; credit card cases and holders; wallets; purses; belts; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods’. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
It stated as follows- "the applicant's handbags; vanity cases (not fitted), briefcases, articles of luggage, wallets, purses (not of precious metal or coated therewith), leather shoulder belts; bags; sporrans; credit card holders; card holders; key holders (in class 18) are similar to a low degree to the opponent's clothing (in class 25). [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:20 am
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., No. 101,000 (May 4, 2012). [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 1:54 am
Specifically, he addressed the legality of:Conditioning trade funds on minimum retail price points consistent with the resale price maintenance standards of Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:39 pm
The clearest example of this difference is the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
Governor for the State of Alabama, (11th Cir., April 2, 2014), the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a number of claims by an Odinist inmate, including his complaint that he was denied religious items (rune container, leather folder for study materials, quartz crystal and outdoor fire pit); claims of retaliation; security threat group designation; destruction of his artwork; and his challenge to the prison's faith-based honor dorm.In McKinley v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 3:56 pm
Complaint Filed - The state AGs filed a complaint, New York v. [read post]
