Search for: "State v. Levine" Results 81 - 100 of 1,898
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm by Levin Papantonio
Levin Papantonio Rafferty (LPR) attorneys fighting to hold social media companies accountable for recommending harmful content or supporting acts of international terrorism by hosting terrorist content filed amici curiae (friends of the court) briefs with the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States, Sarah Friedman on  Hansberry v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
They also state that they expect the app’s users to follow the guidelines to receive the best possible results. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Last post, we discussed Gad v Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP 2022 NY Slip Op 34357(U) December 20, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156841/2021 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court’s increasing reliance on text, history, and tradition in 2022 decisions such as New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These factual contentions concerning whether defendant continued to represent plaintiff during the relevant time period so as to toll the limitations period give rise to factual issues that cannot be resolved in this pre-answer motion to dismiss (see Boesky v Levine, 193 AD3d 403 [1st Dept 2021]; Johnson v Law Off. of Kenneth B. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm by Jeffrey Lubbers
Justice Robert Jackson famously described the Act four years later in the case of Wang Yang Sung v. [read post]