Search for: "State v. Machin" Results 81 - 100 of 4,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2013, 10:00 am by Jason Rantanen
  One limitation, however, requires "making a wager at a particular gaming machine in the network of gaming machines." [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am by Toby Lovett, Olswang LLP
Before permission was granted appeal the decision in to the Court of Appeal, a reference was made to the Court of Justice of the European Union, which ruled in favour of Rank and stated that the EU principle of fiscal neutrality can be invoked in circumstances where the UK has treated certain similar gaming machines differently for VAT purposes. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am by Eric Goldman
Moreover, Mason’s claim that Machine Zone’s misconduct transpired in California is insufficient because the only alleged connection between the company and the state is that Machine Zone’s headquarters is located there. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:29 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:54 am
The issue in this case is whether a "process" must be tied to a particular machine or apparatus or transform a particular article into a different state or thing in order to be eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:02 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States and the Innocent Machine Gun Owner: The Good, the Bad, and the Dangerous on SSRN. [read post]