Search for: "State v. Madera"
Results 81 - 100
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
The DLSE has adopted the test which the California Supreme Court announced in the case of Madera Police Officers Assn. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 11:56 am
Madera, 76 Mass. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm
” (Tiffany A. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:29 am
"Appellant was released from state prison on Wednesday, May 24, 2006, on parole after a Madera County conviction of forcible rape in concert. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:18 pm
From the opinion: This Court recently addressed a timing issue involving a prosecution under SORNA in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Save Tara v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law) United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:08 pm
By Cori Badgley In Gray v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:10 pm
Defend the Bay v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:25 pm
City of Madera, 524 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 10:36 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:28 am
This I said when the Madera case was first brought up. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:32 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
Ct. 1904, 1912 (2000) (vacating federal arson conviction due to insufficient nexus between the alleged criminal activity and interstate commerce); United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
Madera, Ahmed J. [read post]
