Search for: "State v. Mai X." Results 81 - 100 of 3,537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School, heard 11 – 12 April 2011. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Ex Parte Young.Judge Nelson's opinion expressly concedes that "Wolfe v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:38 am by Madelaine Lane
On Wednesday, May 12, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order staying further trial court proceedings in the matter of People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:40 am by DMLP Staff
Yesterday the Digital Media Law Project, with help from the Cyberlaw Clinic, filed an amicus brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
On or around May 20, 2017, Dental Dynamics secured the sale of the X-Ray unit from Jolly Dental to Dr. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
p. 2 keep it “totally secret[,] because one day we [may] need to escape the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Count V: Trademark Infringement - Apple has a bunch of trademarks. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:04 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v HK (Turkey) [2010] EWCA Civ 583 (27th May 2010) Haugesund Kommune & Anor v Depfa ACS Bank [2010] EWCA Civ 579 (27 May 2010) Varsani v Relfo Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 560 (27 May 2010) Egal, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 584 (27 May 2010) Kookmin Bank v Rainy Sky SA… [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:41 am by sally
Supreme CourtAdams, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18 (11 May 2011)Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 & Anor [2011] UKSC 19 (11 May 2011)Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)Zejmowicz & Anor, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1173 (11 May 2011) Nicholas & Anor v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1175 (11 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)Mahan Air & Anor v Blue Sky… [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am by Jeff Redding
  I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:08 am
But I'd still say, at least upon first glance, that the crime's not "over" until X leaves the house, even though it may be "complete" upon initial entry. [read post]