Search for: "State v. Makee R."
Results 81 - 100
of 34,853
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 5:38 am
Bentley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:41 pm
Palkon et. al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
Pascale v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
As has been made clear by the Court of Appeal in cases such as R v Foreign Secretary (No. 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 158, the purpose of providing an embargoed draft to the parties is not to enable them to re-argue the merits of the case. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Gorsuch makes a brilliant suggestion. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
To make their causation case in the first MDL trial cases, plaintiffs’ counsel nominated a statistician, Martin T. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
In P.D. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The key to navigating this distinction is not “whether making official announcements could fit within the job description; but whether making official announcements is actually part of the job that the State entrusted the official to do. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
This judgment came just a week before the Supreme Court of Canada released a decision on rape myths and stereotypes, in which it reiterated its recognition of the myth of “false allegations of sexual assault based on ulterior motives” (R v Kruk, 2024 SCC 7 (CanLII) at paras 35-37). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
The actus reus for a lottery offence under s. 207 is established by proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the following: The accused did something that was not authorized by s. 207, that is: The accused was not a member of government acting lawfully, the accused was not a charitable or religious organization with a licence, was not a member of a fair or exhibition or a lessee of a licensed or lawful concession, did not agree with the government of another province, as a government member, that… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
” Arthur R. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
Rick Scott, R-Fla., told his X followers why he thought former President Donald Trump should be reelected. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:29 am
R. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account… [read post]
