Search for: "State v. Manhattan" Results 81 - 100 of 2,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2011, 5:44 am by Caroline Camp
Morse, 09-03581, New York State Supreme Court, New York County (Manhattan).The owner of the Salander-O'Reilly Galleries, Lawrence [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:08 am by Scott R. Powell
District Court in Manhattan heard oral arguments in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:07 am
Yesterday I attended a program where two Manhattan Institute scholars presented the findings from their report:  IN THE WAKE OF WYETH V. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
New York State Attorney General ~ Notice of ClaimQuintanar v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:00 am
(Since that last claim wasn’t “cognizable as a matter of law,” the AD2 declined to revive it.)I guess they couldn’t have stated it any better.# # #DECISIONK.W. v State of New York# # #COMMENTARY: We believe it's shameful, and hypocritical, that the Attorney General's Office is taking a hard-line position in these cases.In a statement issued on January 28, 2019, in response to the passage of the Child Victims Act, New York State… [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:47 am by Madeleine A. Hensler
On March 7, 2013, a federal court in Manhattan ruled, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
On Monday, the justices hear oral argument in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 3:23 pm by David Lat
Kaplan, Roberta Kaplan, SCOTUS, Stop and Frisk, Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:46 pm
If the name Jeb Corliss doesn't ring a bell, he is the guy who got busted trying to parachute off the Empire State Building in July 2006. [read post]
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:11 am
This post draws upon an article forthcoming in the Virginia Law Review The Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]