Search for: "State v. Mark T."
Results 81 - 100
of 11,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
In Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:41 am
The State). [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:37 pm
" And online at The Atlantic, law professor Garrett Epps has an essay titled "A Major Church-State Ruling That Shouldn't Have Happened: In Trinity v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
John Bean Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:09 pm
Only owner of a mark can sue for cybersquatting — Garruto v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court is engaged in behavior never before seen in American history argues Mark Lemley, the William H. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:51 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm
linkSomerset, Red was assigned to Republican states in the annual election night maps used by the TV networks. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
A few hours before the World Cup’s kick-off match, the General Court wrote another Chapter of the “R10” saga, concerning a trade mark related to one of the funniest Brazilian football players ever [Case T‑137/09 RENV, Nike International Ltd v OHIM, available in Frenchand Spanish]. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:43 am
Promote Innovation LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The GC made references to case law both in favour and against taking into account the time at which the EUIPO gives its decision on the opposition - in essence, querying whether the fact that an earlier sign (with an earlier right) could lose such status at a later date (e.g. following the possible withdrawal of a Member State in which the mark enjoys protection) would affect the outcome of the case (see by analogy T-598/18 Grupo Brownie decision, para 19).The GC… [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:48 am
Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim was granted. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:24 am
Omega SA (Omega AG) (Omega LTD.) v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:58 pm
North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
A miscellaneous statement in the application indicated ed that "[t]he 'XXXX' in the mark denotes the unabbreviated name of a state of the United States and Puerto Rico. [read post]
