Search for: "State v. Mark T. Smith"
Results 81 - 100
of 989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA… [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
BPI Sports, LLC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* Impulse trade mark registration: no sweat, as AG gives his viewJeremy reports on the Opinion of Advocate General Wahl in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the CJEU from the Budapest Municipal Court. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
Smith) [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 7:31 am
Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:28 am
As the recipient of the Mark T. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
Larry Cunningham has posted on the recent Lyondell Chemical Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 8:42 am
Coakley (Mark Rienzi), and the lawyer for the state of Illinois (who was defending the state’s mandatory union dues program) in Harris v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm
As a consequence, an older, pre-Smith line of cases controlled, which holds that a law that burdens religion must pass "strict scrutiny": the law must serve a compelling state interest and restrict religion only as much as necessary. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
Let's see what the Secretary for State says.Something to read? [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
In Smith v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm
Concepcion, and Smith v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:23 am
" Smith v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am
Mary SchroederUnited States v. [read post]
