Search for: "State v. Mazzone"
Results 81 - 100
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
” Briefly: At ACSblog, Piper Hoffman argues that the Supreme Court should deny certiorari in Dukes v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:52 am
And discussing the decision at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone observes that the Court’s general approach to state court decisions “is to ignore all but the biggest errors. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:50 pm
Examples include Marbury v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:33 am
” Briefly: At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone reports that during the last Term the Court “continued [a] trend” of “reviewing relatively few decisions from the state courts but reversing a very high proportion of them. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:47 pm
And plaintiffs are understandably angered by the state's inaction. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
United States, a sentencing case that was argued on Monday. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm
Professor Rick Hasen has some thoughts on RNC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Yates v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
It might be possible, as Andy Koppelman has argued, to strike down DOMA and uphold state bans on same-sex marriage if the Court applies the Romer v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:47 am
[www.nylj.com]
United States, appellee v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 6:44 am
David Savage reports for the Los Angeles Times on Cullen v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:27 pm
Grutter v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am
Commentary on Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 7:14 am
First, Neil Buchanan discusses Segal's criticism of schools for teaching Hadley v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
A New York Probate Lawyer said that with respect to the issue of attorney fees, the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal fees rendered in the course of an estate as held in Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:33 am
Commercial speech v. speaker—corporate entity v. person. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:01 pm
Texas in 2003); and we have anti-miscegenation laws, struck down when 16 states still had them (Loving v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:01 pm
Texas in 2003); and we have anti-miscegenation laws, struck down when 16 states still had them (Loving v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
Nissen, 17 AD3d 819; Mazzone v. [read post]
