Search for: "State v. McNamara"
Results 81 - 100
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 3:48 pm
That’s why, in cases like Munaf v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 3:00 am
McNamara v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 6:04 pm
Reynolds v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
See LaForest v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
The case of Tods Murray v Arakin and Mr McNamara’s position as a “Vexatious Litigant” featured in the Sunday Herald : A-courting we will go ... [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Lawrence McNamara, who runs the ESRC-funded Law, Terrorism and the Right to Know project at the University of Reading, has raised the issue of employment tribunals and closed proceedings, in light of the forthcoming J&S Bill. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:53 pm
(represented by Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C.). [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
The Facebook claims appear to be equally vulnerable to invalidation based on the currently muddled state of statutory subject matter jurisprudence. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm
A post on the Freemovement blog on the recent case of Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department states that just that may be happening in a subset of immigration cases. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm
However, given the current state of the case law, there seems to be a reasonable case for clarification in this area. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:02 pm
Gibbs write that a recent Florida federal district court ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 1:53 pm
Chairman of the NORD Board of Directors and Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
It happened again last week in Compere v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am
She stated that in February 2010 Ms. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 2:15 pm
Capital One has been sued for this very same thing several times in the last two years: McNamara v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:12 am
” In addition to the Report to Congress, NORD states in the petition that the organization’s requests are consistent with the recommendations of a recent finding of the Institute of Medicine, which released a report in October 2010, titled “Rare Diseases and Orphan Products: Accelerating Research and Development,” and with the testimony delivered by Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. [read post]
