Search for: "State v. Mems"
Results 81 - 100
of 787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Corp., No. 3:20-CV-00751-MEM (M.D. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 8:27 am
Lawson (Thomas, J., dissenting) (mem.) [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 5:17 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:57 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:42 am
Buyer v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:23 am
This case asks whether you can sue the medical provider for charging more than 75 cents.The case is Ortiz v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Generally, a process server’s affidavit of service establishes a prime facie case as to the method of service and, therefore, gives rise to a presumption of proper serviceIn Matter of Reyes v Munoz, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226157 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Centro da memória da eletricidade no Brasil. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm
A. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
That case, Texas v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 10:48 am
Inst. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am
In Sinnott v Sinnott, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 1901679, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
