Search for: "State v. Michael I." Results 81 - 100 of 6,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 1:20 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
I thank the prevailing defense attorney for State Farm, Daniel Rivetti of the Pittsburgh law firm of Robb Leonard Mulvihill for advising me of this decision. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
According to the logic of The Reasoning State, whatever flaw exists in West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
 (Michael Smith previewed the case yesterday for this blog.) [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 2:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
I disagree with the Majority that Page did not adequately allege that it is reasonably conceivable that Oath, acting through Michael R. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
I came across the Supreme Court of the United States wiki ("SCOTUS Wiki") today while trying to hunt down a copy of the recent Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) letter to the editor published by Michael D. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 1:06 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Cf. the pompous, confused, Delphic, and ultimately verging on useless analysis that Justice Cardozo offered in Welch v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 pm by Ilya Somin
But if so, that's still a triumph of consequentialist "living constitution" reasoning over originalism.The post Michael Rappaport on "the Originalist Disaster" of the Supreme Court's Ruling in Trump v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 1:03 pm
Christopher Ward (USDC MA 05-30055 Ponsor, USDJ) (prior state convictions with inadequate plea colloquy) 06-2595, USA v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:03 am by MBettman
On April 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Gregory Forman
In the history of South Carolina husbands who wish they had a prenup, I bet there are few with more justification for this feeling than Andrew Michael Myers. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:00 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford On Monday, October 24, I’ll be participating in a panel discussion at NYU on the The Implications of Chevron v. [read post]