Search for: "State v. Mier"
Results 81 - 100
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
That is what the Supreme Court said as well in Hamdi v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
Miers, now a private attorney in Washington, D.C.) [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:10 am
Liberals Use Supreme Court Gun Case to Bolster Other Rights
Legal Times
The Supreme Court's ruling in D.C. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:04 am
The outrage of thinking that Article V of the Constitution can be used! [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:31 pm
House of Representatives v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
Just as importantly, she was an evangelical who was expressly promised to the right wing to be for overturning Roe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 6:03 pm
According to today’s opinion from the US District Court of DC, Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:18 pm
Miers is absolutely immune from compelled congressional process. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Similarly, in Nixon v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 8:01 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:48 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:41 pm
Simpson's criminal trial) and Opening Arguments: A Young Lawyer's First Case: United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
Donald Mier and Rose Mier (NFP) - "Florida satisfied the home state test because the Parents and the Children had lived there for five years, and since the Parents still reside there. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:27 pm
To be sure, in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:32 am
Under United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:43 am
As I explained, however, the problem with resort to this ordinary course in these cases (e.g., Miers, Bolton) is that the (Acting) Attorney General will almost certainly instruct the U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:06 am
Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:32 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
