Search for: "State v. Mourning"
Results 81 - 100
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
Even jurisdictions with a tradition of appointments with prior political experience have employed them less frequently in recent years; despite perennial speculation, no judge of the highest courts of the United States, Australia, Canada or the United Kingdom served in elected office prior to their appointment.The end to this tradition of judges with experience in public life has been mourned in other nations. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:07 pm
Scalia’s seat had remained empty during formal mourning period, which ended in mid-February. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
Private practice and the state bench followed. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:01 pm
County (2013) and NFIB v. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:41 pm
Some Poor Fuckup or United States of America v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
The Herald has also used the case to analyse the state of Australia as a jurisdiction for defamation litigation. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:48 am
As Justice Blackmun presciently stated in his dissent in Webster v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am
Casey (1992), Virginia v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm
While we’re on the subject of alcohol and rational deliberation (presuming at least a process of ‘democratic deliberation within’ before casting one’s vote), Elster also notes that in Tanner v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:49 am
The Florida Supreme Court ruling in Valle v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 6:11 pm
THE PROSECUTOR v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:38 am
" Sligh v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 5:18 am
Patent and Trademark Office, BETAMAX remains very much alive in the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
But while mourning the loss of their colleague, the other state-on-top habeas cases made it back for another week: Ryan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
In White v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:49 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
While at WilmerHale he was the lead counsel representing the University of Michigan and its then president Lee Bollinger before the United States Supreme Court in the famous Gratz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:41 am
His concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:41 am
His appeal was denied by the 11th Circuit, but Bostock’s attorneys argued the circuit’s precedents conflicted with two United States Supreme Court decisions: Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
