Search for: "State v. Nelson " Results 81 - 100 of 2,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2023, 5:27 am by Will Baude
And this is not, as Baude argues, "the same case as Maine v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on July 12, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on July 12, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Fraser Nelson claimed that the ruling “puts IPSO in violation of its own charter” and “has torn up” protections for opinion. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Justice Nelson’s concurrence in Dred Scott v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Historians appear prominently in the Supreme Court's decision in Haaland v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This very short essay summarizes the background of the Second Amendment and the subsequent judicial interpretations up through the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:01 am by Rick Garnett
The best-known instance and illustration of Justice Breyer's church-state intuitions is his concurring opinion in Van Orden v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am by Rick Garnett
It animated his final Religion Clauses opinion, a 2022 dissent in Carson v. [read post]