Search for: "State v. Perry"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 4:37 am
The state supreme court's Aug. 14 order (full text) in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:34 am
Prop. 8 United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Perry, 2012 U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 8:38 am
United States First Circuit, 10/01/2010 Perry v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:23 am
(Dale Carpenter) The Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:28 am
In that email, Mr Perry stated that he had received a letter purported to come from Judge Hacon himself (it did not). [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:14 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:21 pm
Perry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:21 am
Perry, the challenge to California's Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
As I have previously discussed, the Obama administration has stated that it will file an amicus brief in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:56 pm
Ahead of a Monday hearing in their challenge to California's Prop 8, Gibson Dun's Ted Olson and Boies Schiller's David Boies have released a video that draws a clear parallel between their case (now know as Perry v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:37 pm
" And online at The Atlantic, law professor Garrett Epps has an essay titled "A Major Church-State Ruling That Shouldn't Have Happened: In Trinity v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
Perry (Proposition 8 constitutional challenge) and Windsor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:13 am
United States (on the federal Defense of Marriage Act) and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
The second is United States v.... [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:26 am
In the wake of the Court's decisions in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:25 pm
Perry (docket no. 12-144) and United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 10:35 am
Perry (docket no. 12-144) and United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm
Perry (docket no. 12-144) and United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:06 am
In the case of Perry v. [read post]
