Search for: "State v. Pond" Results 81 - 100 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am by Joyce Kung
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm by Joe Koncelik
If it does impact a navigable water in that manner, then it falls under federal jurisdiction A key issue at the trial of Joseph David Anderson was whether the ponds Mr. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:41 am by Christopher Mathews
  The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals tackled that somewhat messy issue with its recent decision and order in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 10:13 pm by Robert Boggs
Just this week on January 18th, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington in Davis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 10:13 pm by Robert Boggs
Just this week on January 18th, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington in Davis v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:30 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
What qualifies as "property" and the right to exclude: While the consent of individual officials representing the United States cannot "estop" the United States, see Montana v. [read post]