Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 81 - 100
of 36,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2025, 6:05 am
In this information ecosystem, it is crucial that people retain the ability to track how State power is being used. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
Holm, 285 U.S. 355 (1932), in which the Court held that the "legislative" power of the state under Article I, section 4 was defined by the state's constitution and, therefore, included the governor's veto power). [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 9:10 pm
Long2, and State of New Jersey v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
” The post Executive Power Under Dames & Moore v Regan appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:54 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:16 pm
Supreme Court issued its decision in Trump v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 4:56 am
Lyle Denniston at SCOTUS Blog tells why the Bush administration thinks Presidents have power to order state courts to obey the World Court - in this case, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Meddellin v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 1:25 pm
Power Dist. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:52 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CB and another [2012] EWCA Civ 418; [2012] WLR (D) 112 “Where a court made a non-derogating control order in proceedings against a person under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005, it had no jurisdiction to order a permanent stay of such proceedings under the Act nor under its case management powers in the Civil Procedure Rules, unless the controlled person requested such a course of action.” WLR Daily, 3rd April… [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 8:55 am
United States on SSRN. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:44 am
However, one case directly touches on Latina/o voting power, and... [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:48 pm
It identifies the case of United States v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
((McDonald v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Policy restricted powers Regina (NA (Iraq)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Others Court of Appeal “Instructions to entry clearance officers that S-series passports were no longer acceptable as evidence of identity and nationality amounted to an unlawful restriction on their powers to decide in individual cases whether such a passport met requirements. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:08 am
He argued that the states did not give up all of their powers related to war. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:22 am
For a long time now, scholars have pinpointed the definitive starting point in the 1889 Supreme Court case of Chae Chan Ping v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 2:59 am
In March 2025 the Supreme Court of Appeal reaffirmed that if the exercise of a power depends on the existence of a state of affairs as a jurisdictional fact, in the absence of a clear expression to the contrary, the person exercising that power will not likely be found to be the only judge as to whether the state of affairs exists that permits the exercise of such power. [read post]
