Search for: "State v. Privat"
Results 81 - 100
of 33,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 4:41 pm
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:41 pm
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Pollard [SCOTUSblog backgrounder; JURIST report] that where state tort law authorizes adequate remedies for individuals harmed by private employees working at a federal facility, and where the private employees have no employment or contractual relationship with the government, no remedy under Bivens v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
See Gold v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
Under the Court’s state-action doctrine, a private entity may qualify as a state actor when the entity exercises “powers traditionally exclusively reserved to the State. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 12:45 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 1:52 am
This is a Right to Work for Less state! [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:10 am
In Hile v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:40 am
The US Supreme Court today agreed to take up the question of Bivens suits against employees of privately operated federal prisons, granting certiorari in the case of Minneci v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm
United States, the Ninth Circuit en banc struck down California's ban on privately-run immigrant detention centers. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 10:08 am
Poppell, et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 8:14 am
Brunswick, GA— Openings are expected in Georgia this week in what is likely a first-in-the-nation state court trial concerning private plaintiffs’ claims related to the opioid epidemic. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
* See Alicea v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
* See Alicea v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:11 am
If wrongly decided, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:09 am
Manheim Township School District * More Teenagers Mistakenly Think “Private” Chat Conversations Will Remain Private–People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:39 am
No private right of action against “state actors” pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights LawMcGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632, Decided January 28, 2009The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia.On September 25, 2003, McGovern filed a complaint of race… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
No private right of action against "state actors" pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights LawMcGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632, Decided January 28, 2009The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 3:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
