Search for: "State v. R. F."
Results 81 - 100
of 13,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
This judgment came just a week before the Supreme Court of Canada released a decision on rape myths and stereotypes, in which it reiterated its recognition of the myth of “false allegations of sexual assault based on ulterior motives” (R v Kruk, 2024 SCC 7 (CanLII) at paras 35-37). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
” Arthur R. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:29 am
R. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gallen), and Alexander F. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gallen), and Alexander F. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
Proc. 97-35, and cases like RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
§ 5714(f). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:04 am
R. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:12 am
(Preliminary Objections) (I.C.J.), with introductory note by Bertrand Ramcharan Documents on the Consequences of the Aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, Namely the Enlarged Partial Agreement on the Register of Damage Caused, with introductory note by Bill Bowring Case C-663/21, Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Citing SCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Citing SCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:16 am
Greene v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
R J Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm
United States, 919 F. [read post]
