Search for: "State v. R. H." Results 81 - 100 of 4,714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm by Giles Peaker
While the provision considered is effectively the same, there is a distinction made in terms of justification of policy which may be significant.It is a reasoned decision based on Article 14, distinguishing MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2013] EWHC 2213 (QB). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm by Giles Peaker
While the provision considered is effectively the same, there is a distinction made in terms of justification of policy which may be significant.It is a reasoned decision based on Article 14, distinguishing MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2013] EWHC 2213 (QB). [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 2:55 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
David Ryce, No. 111,698 (Sedgwick)State appeal (petition for review)Patrick H. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:17 am
In concluding that the challenged disposition condition here did not violate KH-H’s First Amendment rights, we are guided by United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, R (PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa, BH (AP) and another v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland), KAS or H (AP) v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland) and Genoa  Filipek-Kwasny v Polish Judicial Authority, heard 5 – 8 March 2012. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 1:33 am
As stated stated in this post, the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]