Search for: "State v. Reliance Ins. Co." Results 81 - 100 of 399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2022, 5:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s contention that the motion court in the fee dispute would have awarded her predecision interest pursuant to CPLR 5001 is at best speculative (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, 443 [2007]; see also Manufacturer’s & Traders Trust Co. v Reliance Ins. [read post]