Search for: "State v. Rolling" Results 81 - 100 of 4,363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Default status means what it sounds like: Google is pre-loaded and ready to roll “out of the box. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The affidavit of service states he was served by “nail and mail” service. [read post]
  This method was the method widely used by employers before the Harpur Trust v Brazel judgment. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am by David Pocklington
With regard to the concerns of the SPAB [16] to [21], the Chancellor stated: “[22]. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm by Greg Lambert
All right, Luis and Angel in Spain have been doing that for with his opponent countries over 35 years, and not just in the United States, but worldwide. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Co. v Campbell (538 US 408 [2003]), and Gomez v Cabatic (159 AD3d 62 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]