Search for: "State v. Rose" Results 81 - 100 of 2,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am by Eric Goldman
The Court stressed that the legislation was not based on a finding of a pattern of patent infringement by the states, nor on a determination that such state patent infringements as did occur rose to the level of a due process violation. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:24 am by sally
Supreme Court Patmalniece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] UKSC 11 (16 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rose v R. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:31 pm by Zachary Spilman
Moreover, in light of our decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Changing Testimony: In a deposition, Shaw stated that he invented and began selling modified roses in 1994. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:12 am by Hannah Catt
He used a case study from one of his successful cases, Oklahoma Genetics Inc. v. [read post]