Search for: "State v. Russo " Results 81 - 100 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees ;and South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Kevin Daley reports at The Washington Free Beacon that it was “the first time since ;Bush v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Russo, involving Louisiana’s law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital, and Seila Law v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am by Jackie McDermott
Russo, the first major abortion case the Court has heard since 2016, ;and Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Russo, a challenge to a Louisiana law regulating abortion in which the state contends that abortion providers do not have a legal right to sue on behalf of their patients, arguing that “women can speak for themselves—and can speak for themselves best. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Russo, a challenge to a Louisiana law regulating abortion, observing that “[b]ecause the potential consequences of Louisiana’s initiative are so severe, the case is really a test of whether a state can effectively legislate abortion out of existence without criminalizing patients or doctors for seeking or providing it per se, or by attacking Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Russo, a challenge to a Louisiana law regulating abortion in which the state contends that abortion providers do not have a legal right to sue on behalf of their patients. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” Bill Mears reports for Fox News that the case “is part of a larger effort by red states to pass laws regulating abortion to test how supportive the new justices will be of precedents like Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Michael Semler weighs in on Liu v. [read post]