Search for: "State v. Save" Results 81 - 100 of 11,663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:34 pm by Doug Van Gessel and Sean Maffett
In a decision that could save some commercial property owners hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes, the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District of California held in 731 Market Street Owner, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Alternatively, Dobbs, Bruen, and West Virginia v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:23 pm by webmaster
It is this “saving clause” that provided the most formidable logical obstacle to the AT&T v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:11 am
Justices Souter and Ginsburg dissented, insisting that the statute is unconstitutional under the Court's precedents, New York v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 7:02 am
Illinois currently only has individual 529 plans, although some other states have 529 plans maintained by a state agency or a public college. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:00 am by Steven B. Katz
 States made liberal use of the savings clause to avoid the FAA’s enforcement mandate by deploying a veneer to generality to save rules aimed at limiting the enforcement of arbitration agreements.In Mortensen v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
I'm saddened, though, that they're redirecting the savings not to diversion programming or community supervision but to lease private prison beds:Instead of closing the other two prisons, [State Rep. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:44 am
March 29, 1937 is the date the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in West Coast Hotel Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:30 am by Brad Schnure
Ed Durr praised a decision by the United States Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]