Search for: "State v. Schlesinger "
Results 81 - 100
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
"Under those circumstances, the burden must be on the plaintiff seeking such a recovery to demonstrate by evidence rather than by conclusory allegations, that he indeed suffered substantial financial loss because of misdeeds by his attorneys and not by second guessing as to their judgment" (Becker v Julien, Blitz & Schlesinger, P.C., 95 Misc 2d 64, 68 [Sup Ct, New York County 1977], modified on other grounds 66 AD2d 674 [1st Dept 1978], appeal dismissed 47… [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:09 am
"Under those circumstances, the burden must be on the plaintiff seeking such a recovery to demonstrate by evidence rather than by conclusory allegations, that he indeed suffered substantial financial loss because of misdeeds by his attorneys and not by second guessing as to their judgment" (Becker v Julien, Blitz & Schlesinger, P.C., 95 Misc 2d 64, 68 [Sup Ct, New York County 1977], modified on other grounds 66 AD2d 674 [1st Dept 1978], appeal dismissed 47 NY2d 705… [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
Schechter Poultry Corporation v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:00 am
Accordingly, each has abstained under the principles of Schlesinger v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 12:01 am
Ferguson that resulted in Brown v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:29 am
In Landau, P.C. v LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross ;2010 NY Slip Op 50620(U) ;Decided on April 7, 2010 ;Supreme Court, New York County ;Schlesinger, J. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:33 pm
See, e.g., Schlesinger v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:00 pm
Councilman Abstention The harder question is the one to which Peter rightly devotes more space, namely whether the district court ought to abstain from hearing Nashiri’s claim under Schlesinger v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:21 am
"); Schlesinger v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court case Laird v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Schlesinger, No. 05-3021 Conviction on a variety of arson and fraud charges is affirmed over claim that 28 U.S.C. section 2461(c)(2005) did not authorize the criminal forfeiture of the proceeds of his mail and wire fraud offenses. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On the same day Collins J gave judgment in the case of Dew v Mills Nanyn . [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 3:53 pm
The policy’s computer crime coverage section states that “The Company will pay the Insured for the Insured’s direct loss of, or direct loss from damage to, Money, Securities and Other Property directly caused by Computer Fraud. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 7:01 pm
” Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am
When it first came out, his scholarship was praised by at least one eminent historian, Arthur Schlesinger, Sr. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
