Search for: "State v. Short"
Results 81 - 100
of 22,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
The standard of the experiments also fell short of what would have been required for a peer-reviewed publication. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
The sex, in her consistent telling, was bad, short, but not criminal. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm
In short, private international law rules include choice of law rules (where a sales contract is governed by a CISG State’s law because of a choice of law clause) and conflict of laws rules (where, absent party choice of law, the forum’s rules indicate that a CISG State’s law is to apply). [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:52 pm
” UC President Michael V. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:24 pm
Simplot Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
The short answer is: It depends. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
But the decisions in those cases were for the most part short-lived or limited in impact. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
Thomas wrote a short dissent from denial of the petition. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
Johnson v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
The success of restitution procedures created during[6] and immediately[7] after World War II was short-lived. [read post]
