Search for: "State v. Singh "
Results 81 - 100
of 619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 2:15 am
The appellant was diagnosed with severe post-traumatic stress disorder and claimed her immigration detention was contrary to the Hardial Singh principles and contrary to the Secretary of State’s policy in respect of detaining persons suffering with mental illness. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:40 am
Antulay v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
The firm’s Tejinder Singh was among the counsel on an ;amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees ;and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm
In that case, the judge relied on the principle explained by Mr Justice Munby in Sulaiman v Juffali [2002] 1 FLR 479, that Religion … is not the business of government or of the secular courts. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
Anam v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1140 – Read judgment This appeal raises interesting questions about the approach the courts should take when considering whether detention pending deportation is legal in a case involving an ex-convict with serious psychiatric illness. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:42 am
Should law clerk B edit it?... [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
The contrast with the approach of the Court of Appeal in British Chiropractic Assocation v Singh is instructive. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 10:36 am
See, eg, Rosenberg v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:02 am
State of Ohio v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Corp., 175 AD3d 1132 [1st Dept 2019]; see also La Porta v Alacra, Inc., 142 AD3d 851, 852 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Corp., 175 AD3d 1132 [1st Dept 2019]; see also La Porta v Alacra, Inc., 142 AD3d 851, 852 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am
Perry; The firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an ;amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
; The arbitration clause in question stated: "21. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d at 77-78; see generally Singh v Sukhram, 56 AD3d at 192; Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d at 109-110). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:03 am
Again, in the case of Satbir Singh v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
In this post, Sam Porter, an Associate in the Planning team at CMS, previews the upcoming Supreme Court decision in the case of Hillside Parks Limited v Snowdonia National Park Authority UKSC 2020/0211. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:25 pm
The formation of a larger bench is a much-belated response to the request of a 5-judge bench of the Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v Jaibir Singh[3]for a larger bench for reconsideration of the BWSSB verdict. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:11 pm
The formation of a larger bench is a much-belated response to the request of a 5-judge bench of the Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v Jaibir Singh[3]for a larger bench for reconsideration of the BWSSB verdict. [read post]
