Search for: "State v. Singh " Results 81 - 100 of 619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am by CMS
In this post, Sam Porter, an Associate in the Planning team at CMS, previews the upcoming Supreme Court decision in the case of Hillside Parks Limited v Snowdonia National Park Authority UKSC 2020/0211. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
As Wilson J. stated for the Court ;in R. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
  In addition to ensuring candour in Cabinet discussions, this Court in Carey v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The complaint, as augmented by the affidavit of Singh submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss, sufficiently stated a cause of action for legal malpractice (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; Doe v Ascend Charter Schs., 181 AD3d 648, 649-650). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
This contribution has been made more interesting by the distribution (in English) of the State Council's White Paper:  China: Democracy That Works on 4 December 2021 (original:  中国的民主 also distributed on 4 December) and its companion White Paper "The State of Democracy in the United States"  (5 December 2021; Official English translation HERE);… [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d at 77-78; see generally Singh v Sukhram, 56 AD3d at 192; Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d at 109-110). [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm by JURIST Staff
Reiterating its stance, the Solicitor General on Monday submitted that the 2018 decision in Navtej Singh Johar v. [read post]