Search for: "State v. Slotness"
Results 81 - 100
of 431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2010, 3:46 am
In Kidwell v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:38 am
Larry Pitt & Associates v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:33 am
State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:26 pm
The Supreme Court in Storer v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:47 am
The “sanctity of the home” case is Hunsberger v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 3:12 am
GC2 Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 5:05 am
State, 366 N.C. 323 (2012) (decided the same day as Hest Technologies and on the same basis) Sandhill Amusements, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
Notably, the Court of Appeal stated that subsequent case law, including Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] UKHL 22, has placed greater emphasis on the need to view planning permissions as a whole rather than as consent for delineable acts of development. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:47 pm
Patent Rights Protection Group v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:29 am
The City's position in this regard relied on the infamous case of Boub v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 12:26 pm
Probably the most interesting was the order depublishing Sony Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:18 am
The application stated that it was a design for a “shower drain” (to the upper right).In 2009, the predecessor of Group Nivelles filed an application for invalidity of the design. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
For example, in each of the year’s two blockbuster cases—one expanding gun rights (New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm
” The court had no difficulty applying Olmstead to the case, holding that the state had to provide the services in the adult group home where the plaintiff lived, rather than offering them only in a nursing facility.The Ninth Circuit held that DSHS was violating Title II of the ADA by failing to provide long term care in an integrated community setting rather than a nursing home.Olmstead does not require DSHS to increase the number of slots on the HCBS waiting lists (see… [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 5:09 am
More commentary on Monday’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 1:30 pm
(Coffee v. [read post]
