Search for: "State v. So "
Results 81 - 100
of 117,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:46 am
Facts In State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:57 am
State, 935 So. 2d 98, 99 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)). [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:01 pm
So far, Berry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
DOMA’s avowed purpose and practical effect are to impose a disadvantage, a separate status, and so a stigma upon all who enter into same-sex marriages made lawful by the unquestioned authority 4 UNITED STATES v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:48 am
See Cone v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 12:52 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm
In State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
Thanks SCOTUSBlog for putting up the link to the oral argument transcript in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
But even if preserving marriage were an "important goal," Section 3 does not do so since it leaves it to states to define who may marry. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:58 am
Deane v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 699; [2010] WLR (D) 162 “In determining whether a claimant seeking Carer’s Allowance was ‘receiving full-time education’, so as to be excluded, it was erroneous to ask how many hours were actually spent on the activities which were defined within the applicable Regulations. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:42 am
Helow v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another House of Lords “A judge's membership of a Jewish association whose magazine had expressed partisan views against Palestinian causes did not in itself imply that the judge shared or endorsed such views so as to have raised the possibility of bias and want of impartiality when determining an immigration appeal by a Palestinian activist. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 59; [2008] WLR (D) 266 “A foreign prosecuting authority's plea bargain offer to an accused person whose extradition was sought, did not constitute an abuse of process unless the predicted consequences of refusing the offer were so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A plea bargain offered by a foreign prosecutor to an accused person whose extradition was sought, particularly if offered during a regulated process of plea-bargaining, did not constitute an abuse of process unless it was so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
STATE V. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:27 am
The judgments in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (McGeogh) v The Lord President of the Council and Another (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 63 were handed down in October 2013. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:23 pm
You can read the decision of the Tenth Circuit below here: United States v. [read post]
