Search for: "State v. Spiegel"
Results 81 - 100
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am
The Court stated, "Our analysis is buttressed by an examination of the legislative history behind the amendment [to CPLR 306-b]. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
In its ruling in Kusnierz, the Court of Appeal stated that it preferred Spiegel’s conclusion and reasons in Desbiens to those of the trial judge in Kusnierz. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am
"The court erred in finding that plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for legal [*2]malpractice as against Fogarty. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am
The ability for such an agreement to be concluded has been disputed in the last couple of hours, with Der Spiegel reporting the following: EU officials in Brussels say, because monetary union is regulated extensively in the Lisbon Treaty, reform can only be implemented within the existing legal framework. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied); see also Spiegel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied); see also Spiegel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:30 am
But just see the ICSID press release on the live stream of the Public Hearing started today in the matter Railroad Development Corporation v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:10 am
It is undisputed that the defendants failed to submit such "documentary evidence" when they filed the underlying claim in the Court of Claims and that the underlying claim was dismissed based on that pleading defect (Reed v State of New York, [*2]78 NY2d 1, 7; Gioeli v State of New York, 39 AD3d 815; Piccarreto v State of New York, 144 AD2d 920, 921; Heiss v State of New York, 143 AD2d 67, 69; Ivey v… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:59 am
It is undisputed that the defendants failed to submit such "documentary evidence" when they filed the underlying claim in the Court of Claims and that the underlying claim was dismissed based on that pleading defect (Reed v State of New York, [*2]78 NY2d 1, 7; Gioeli v State of New York, 39 AD3d 815; Piccarreto v State of New York, 144 AD2d 920, 921; Heiss v State of New York, 143 AD2d 67, 69; Ivey v… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
Plaintiff put forth sufficient detail to establish the negligence of the attorneys, that the negligence was the proximate cause of the losses sustained by the benefits funds, and actual damages to those funds (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]; O'Callaghan v Brunelle, 84 AD3d 581, 582 [2011]). [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:11 am
To prevail on a cause of action for legal malpractice, plaintiff must satisfy three elements: (1) the negligence of the attorney; (2) that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and (3) actual damages (Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267-268, 819 N.Y.S.2d 26 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What are the lessons learned so far from the O104:H4 outbreak? [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 10:59 am
Wessel, 780 So. 2d 1006, 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (citing State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am
Spiegel v Rowland, 552 US 1257; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442). [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:00 am
See Levine v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:58 am
145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH, Axel Springer AG, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH, SPIEGEL-Verlag Rudolf AUGSTEIN GmbH & Co KG and Verlag M. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:36 pm
Wessel, 780 So. 2d 1006, 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (citing State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
V. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
