Search for: "State v. Strickland"
Results 81 - 100
of 869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 10:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in the case of Harrington v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 5:56 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 2:06 pm
Van Dyke v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:01 pm
The high standard of Strickland would bar relief under either analysis.U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in Missouri v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:36 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:49 pm
This is a follow up to my last post, where I discussed an opinion issued by the United States Supreme Court, Missouri v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
In the latter case, the Court has directed the parties to address a question in addition to those raised in the petition: Does AEDPA deference apply to a state court’s summary disposition of a claim including a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:01 pm
”) Strickland v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:37 pm
Plain Dealer Publishing Co., a state court judge (Shirley Strickland Saffold) is suing the Cleveland Plan Dealer for stating that comments posted on the newspaper’s website under the screen name “lawmiss” originated from a computer used by the judge and/or her daughter. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:51 pm
” [via FindLaw] McGuire v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:17 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v Kentucky opened the door for an argument that I have always supported-a criminal defense lawyer needs to inform a non-citizen client of the possible immigration consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
" The judge found the claims to be without merit, since the Fourth Circuit does not require unindicted co-conspirators to be named, no statement of facts is required, and the indictment stated the period of the conspiracy.Counsel erred in moving the original indictment into evidence. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:14 am
Under the classic Supreme Court incompetence of counsel case, Strickland v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
Strickland v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 12:54 pm
In this case, the First initially remanded for a new trial (see United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
