Search for: "State v. Target Stores, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Guest  Post: The State of Securities Litigation After Cyan
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
Earn-out providing for return of assets if targets not met, rather than expressly requiring purchaser "effort", will not be rewritten just because the weak economy and other factors have made an asset return unpalatable to the seller
6 Apr 2010, 9:30 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Airborne Health, Inc. v. [read post]
Canadian Securities Law Online - http://www.canadiansecuritieslaw.com/
Jack Daniels v. Bad Spaniels: Trademarks Triumphant Win Over The First Amendment Satirical Speech
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
Whether you operate a large e-commerce company on Amazon, a specialized artisan store on Shopify or Etsy, or a local t-shirt company, all brands producing products resembling famous marks should consider the implications of the seminal Supreme Court ruling in Jack Daniels v. [read post]
KJK Legal News & Insights - https://kjk.com/news-insights/
Home Health Care, Franchise, and Food Industries Under Attack: April 2022 IC Legal News Update
12 May 2022, 6:40 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Flowers Foods Inc., No. 1:20-cv-00411, and Bowen v. [read post]
Independent Contractor Compliance Legal Blog - http://independentcontractorcompliance.com/
Defendant Former Employer Entitled to Forensic Inspection of Plaintiff's Home Computer, at Defendant's Expense
12 Dec 2007, 12:45 pm
MySimon, Inc., 194 F.R.D. 639, 640 (S.D.N.Y.2000) (same); and Playboy Enterprises v. [read post]
Electronic Discovery Law - http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/
Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Van Buren v. United States
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Prestige Entertainment West, Inc.). [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
1H 2017 Quick Links, Part 4 (Copyright, Patent, More)
18 Jul 2017, 6:43 am by Eric Goldman
Copyright * Design Basics, LLC v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
512(f) Preempts Tortious Interference Claim–Copy Me That v. This Old Gal
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
Selkatz Inc., 2020 WL 9074806 (C.D. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the Solar Panel Company and Copying Files
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
Because I find that SunPower's complaint fails to state a claim under CFAA, its only federal cause of action, I will not address the state law claims. [read post]
CYB3RCRIM3 - http://cyb3rcrim3.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Discrimination Against Religion
4 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Puzzlingly calling a venue name a "title," court nonetheless rejects claim against MTV show
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
MGFB Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Section 512(c) Protects Pinterest Despite Its Algorithms–Davis v. Pinterest
4 May 2022, 12:41 pm by Eric Goldman
Pinterest, Inc., 2022 WL 1316566 (N.D. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
McRO Returns to Federal Circuit: Valid but Not Infringed
20 May 2020, 10:09 am by Dennis Crouch
 McRO, Inc. v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Court of Chancery Finds Party in Contempt for Destruction of Evidence; Sanctions Include Heightened Burden of Proof, Waiver of Privilege and "Significant" Award of Attorneys' Fees
26 Dec 2009, 11:44 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
UBS Warburg, Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog - http://www.delawarelitigation.com/
Who Is A Significant Defendant?--Compare The Local Defendant With The Out-Of-State Defendant
20 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
’  The plaintiffs sought ‘significant relief’ from at least three Minnesota defendants--the Target corporation, Coborn’s, Inc. , and Snyder’s Holding Inc. [read post]
Class Action Fairness Act Blog - http://www.cafalawblog.com/
Four Problems with the Supreme Court’s Refusal To Hear the Epic v Apple Dispute
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am by Lazar Radic
”  Cel-Tech Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
Truth on the Market - http://truthonthemarket.com/
If you don't like low-cost imitator brands, you'll love this decision
26 Jan 2017, 7:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Moroccanoil, Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Standard competitive bluster can be used as evidence of bad faith
14 Jul 2016, 8:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hillman Group, Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] ‘Empire’ TV series doesn’t infringe trademark of Empire Distribution music label
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
” Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The Current Securities Landscape of Cryptocurrencies and NFTs
30 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Laser at Cleveland State University College of Law. [read post]
The CLS Blue Sky Blog - https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/