Search for: "State v. Taste"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2017, 6:12 am
ChampagneThe CJEU judgmentThe CJEU substantially followed the AG Opinion, stating that if it tastes like champagne – it is champagne. 1. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:33 am
Round one has been won by lawyer James Alexander in New York in Alexander v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm
Two years ago, the Court launched a thousand law review articles on this topic with its decision in Stoneridge v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:52 pm
Enter Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:39 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:14 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:00 am
By Cori Badgley In Peak-Las Positas Partners v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm
Law Lessons from State of New Jersey v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
But it’s the lawyers who are dominant in business in the United States*. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:21 am
The Court in Aschroft v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:59 am
He states that Dr. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:17 pm
They have some thoughts on Jones v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 7:23 am
Here is a taste: This chapter elaborates on the three central themes of this book as they relate to the national scene: (1) the centrality of colonialism in constituting Mexican Americans as a racial group; (2) the important links between the experience of Mexican Americans and the broader patterns of racial formation and racial ideology in the United States; and (3) the crucial role of law in the social construction of race. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:40 am
This conclusion is in fact also prompted by the following consideration: if, on the one hand, we accept that solutions like the one of the Dutch Supreme Court in Kecofa v Lancôme, ie that copyright could vest in a perfume, may not be tolerated then, on the other hand, protection could not be denied in a certain work just because it does not belong to one of the categories envisaged by a certain Member State’s list of protectable works. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 8:44 pm
Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 6:18 pm
California's prohibition on personalized license plate numbers "that may carry connotations offensive to good taste and decency" constitutes viewpoint discrimination under [Matal v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:12 pm
Here’s a taste of her report: On abortion, Kagan wrote a memo in a case involving a prisoner who wanted the state to pay for her to have the procedure. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:03 pm
A taste: To be sure, it is ordinarily problematic for an organization to discriminate on the basis of religion. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
Now, this weblog has reported one dispute of a distinctly tasteful nature since taste lay at the very heart of it -- Bailey and Williams v Graham and Levi Roots' Reggae Reggae Foods Ltd and another, the celebrated Reggae Reggae sauce case, the facts and outcome of which were lovingly garnished by Cat the Kat here and here). [read post]
