Search for: "State v. Toy" Results 81 - 100 of 1,038
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Per court filings, the dog toy also comes with a tag stating that the product is “not affiliated with the Jack Daniel Distillery” (not pictured). [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:10 pm by Maliya G. Rattliffe
In its 2020 decision, the Ninth Circuit stated that the “Bad Spaniels” toy is covered by the First Amendment, which makes it extremely difficult to sue for trademark infringement. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 11:40 am by Benson Varghese
State v. $1,760.00 in U.S Currency held that these machines did not fall within the exclusion because the distributed tickets were not redeemable exclusively for noncash merchandise prizes, toys or novelties. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 3:58 am by Fred Rocafort
This level can involve special cases, for example, those involving replicas, models, toys, etc. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
[See CTV News Story here and decision in Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Holly Brezee
No. 2,131,693),  Sounds (famous Tarzan’s yell for toys – U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:08 pm by Cary Coglianese
One opportunity to do so is in the treatment that law school courses give to Industrial Union Department v. [read post]